Jump to content

Rusty White

Moderator-at-large
  • Posts

    1,034
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Rusty White last won the day on October 11

Rusty White had the most liked content!

Reputation

99 Excellent

About Rusty White

  • Birthday 02/26/1955

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://flagshipmodels.com
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • FirstName
    Rusty
  • LastName
    White
  • IPMS Number
    20181
  • Local Chapter
    IPMS Metro Oklahoma City
  • City
    Edmond
  • State
    OK
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1,871 profile views
  1. For me, (please don't judge) as long as blatant sex of any kind is left out, I can deal with everything else. I know that's a loaded statement (such as define "blatant") which is why I refer to "me" only.
  2. I stopped advertising with them because of the crazy high prices for ad space.
  3. WOW! I wasn't aware anyone made car models in such large scale. Nicely done!
  4. I was wondering when someone was going to mention that.
  5. Correct. I speak of the "perceived" view everyone in IPMS/USA takes of the "chairmen" and their chapter, which in your previous statement, lives on to this day of the one chapter whose nationals failed. I don't hold anyone personally responsible; s**t happens. My point was, that any chapter and its membership who hosts a national convention takes on a tremendous responsibility for the success of the show, not to mention a boatload of money, which will follow the chapter and it membership for decades if not longer and most of the time it's not very much "fun". I personally spent the entire conventions sitting in meetings and putting out fires as they arose. If anything went wrong, I was blamed, and to this day, I accept any and all responsibility for the '03 convention. It was loooooooooong on work and verrrrrrry short on "fun". Would I do it again? Knowing what I do now, I probably would if asked, but a LOT of things would need to be just right before I would take on such a huge responsibility again.
  6. Nick, If IPMS/USA were to guarantee a set profit to the host chapter, then I'm certain we would all be in it for the "fun". Maybe it's just my mercenary and capitalistic way of thinking, but I didn't consider it too much "fun" putting our club's and my own personal reputation on the line in '03. 😁🤣😂 It wasn't a terrible time I assure you for those two years, but a guaranteed profit would have sure helped. Walk up to anyone who worked a nationals for their club and ask them ; "how much "fun" was it?"
  7. As Ed so eloquently stated, the sci-fi categories are well represented IMHO as a starting point. FYI, all the head category judges are supposed to observe the entry numbers in their respective categories each year. IF an increase is observed in a specific or new category, it's the HCJ's responsibility to propose a new split or category to the NCC as a test for three consecutive years to see how the new numbers increase or decrease. IF at the end of three consecutive years, the HCJ can petition the Chief Judge for a vote by the NCC to accept the new split/category as permanent. Of coarse, the opposite NCC procedure applies if categories/splits have declined in popularity as well. The long and short of it is; nothing categorywise happens overnight in IPMS/USA and sci-fi categories are no different. The category will grow over time as popularity designates.
  8. As has been amply explained here, there is no way to make everyone happy with GA. My policy at the '03 nats was first and foremost, that it was a business intended to make a profit; plain and simple. As I recall, we made the GA fee as equally fair to everyone as we could. Making money on the event was, and always should be, the major consideration for the host chapter. As long as the GA fee is published in advance, everyone can make an informed decision if they want to attend.
  9. What's even better; he's a SHIP GUY! Like Civil War warships? https://flagshipmodels.com/
  10. Ed, IMHO, you have done a more than admirable job as Head Ship Judge over the years. The ship guys have done well during your leadership and I hope you have many more years ahead. I seriously doubt you're are the only HJ dealing with COVID. My prayers are with you and your family.
  11. Noel, I'm no longer an official judge, so it's best to ask the Chief Judge about when judging begins. Registration begins Weds if I'm not mistaken. As the tables slowly begin to fill up, various judges will paruse the various categories they will judge until the official judging begins, suggesting any possible changes to head category judge. When I was head Ship Judge, I had everyone take one last look at all the category(s) entries just make certain we had everything where it belonged according to the rules. FWIW.
  12. Noel, The judges use the registration time to look over the various categories they judge to look for possible changes. This speeds up the judging process. There are always one or two that weren't caught. Those are taken care before judging begins officially.
  13. David, Jim, FWIW, and I have mentioned this before; the entire membership was surveyed. The survey went out in The Journal to the entire membership, was posted on the web site (to the entire membership), and was posted on the forum as well as at the Nationals that year for walk-up voters. IMHO, no one could have been overlooked. If some chose not to answer the survey then IMHO, they fall directly into the "I don't care" category you mention in your post. Either way, the folks who "do care" are the folks we should be interested in because they are the ones (those who vote represent "the baby") who dictate the direction of the Society. I would suggest to all those "I don't care" non-voters out there, that if they don't like the way the Society is being run by "the baby", join "the baby" and vote.
  14. The purpose of the survey was to take the membership's "temperature" regarding the popularity of GSB vs 1,2,3. The survey has no ramifications whatsoever, and there are no plans (known to me anyway) that any changes are forthcoming or being considered by anyone. Hopefully, the E-board will take another survey in 3 or 4 years just to keep an eye on the popularity of the two systems among the membership. In short, I wouldn't lose any sleep worrying about any big changes to the current contest structure.
×
×
  • Create New...