Jump to content

ghodges

IPMS/USA Member
  • Posts

    7,555
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    296

ghodges last won the day on February 20

ghodges had the most liked content!

Reputation

999 Excellent

Profile Information

  • FirstName
    Gil
  • LastName
    Hodges
  • IPMS Number
    10803
  • Local Chapter
    IPMS First Coast
  • City
    Orange Park
  • State
    Florida
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

5,329 profile views
  1. Stunning replication of the reference pics..... I vote one side up and the other down for the seating.... though the pic with both sides up does have a very nice symmetry to it. Gil
  2. I got an "early private edition" for free as I was involved in the creation of the kit (indirectly). It seems my kit was missing a few parts as well as maybe also missing a page or two in the instructions (no painting/markings guide for the OD/gray War Games markings though the decals were included). That's the main reason I scratchbuilt the gunner's seat and gun ring, the roll over structure behind the pilot, and a new main IP. The down side is I had to rely on more of my own references and build some parts. The up side is I got the kit ahead of most others. It does take a steady hand to do the tick marks in a really neat manner (and mine is not that neat), BUT when you make the marks you can start inside and mark towards the outside and not have to worry about the marks outside the circle since they can't be seen; making the process a little less difficult. Or, you can use instrument decals (as in my example pic), though in my experience the tedium of punching them out is as much work as drawing the instruments. In the end, go with WHATEVER system works for you. If I'd had a good looking spare IP that fit, I'd have used it! Cheers! Gil
  3. That’s a beautiful model Gil. I have only worked with resin once and that was figures. Did this require removing large blocks of resin and the accompanying sanding/smoothing? The details you added are incredible. Any chance you might explain the “sandwich” method for us newbies? Most of the parts came as you see in the pic. The only one with a casting block needing removal was the gear doors, and they could be sliced away from the block with only a little cleanup of their edges needed after that. The engine can be put in the cowling without sanding down the thick rear (which I did), but that was a mistake since it was then too close to the rear edge to allow the cowling to fit properly on the fuselage; so I had to grind it down with a motor tool, which was more work than if I had sanded it down earlier. In general, most casting blocks are easily removed with a razor saw or by cutting with a knife blade. Big ones may require a motor tool with a grinding bit or a rotary saw blade, but most don't. However, whenever you do sand/saw resin, wear a mask as the dust gets everywhere and it's not healthy stuff to breathe in! The "sandwich" method for making instrument panels requires two thin sheets of plastic, with the rear one preferably being white. You cut the top one to the shape of your panel. Mark the positions of the instruments in pencil on it and then open up their holes using either a drill bit, the point of a #11 blade (twirled), or using a punch and die set. Add any buttons, instrument bezels, or other detailing to its front that you desire. Paint it AND the second piece of plastic black. Place the top IP piece over the painted second piece and using a pin (or other fine pointed tool) run it around the inside edge of each instrument hole, effectively scratching off the black paint and leaving a white circle for each one. Remove the top piece and use the tool to now scratch the paint off inside each instrument to mark each one, making tick marks and instrument needles for them. Once all of them are made/marked, cut the rear piece to fit behind the top piece. Next, get a piece of clear cellophane (from a cigarette pack or some such source). Cut it big enough to cover the rear instruments. Very carefully glue it to the rear IP part. You can trim it now, or wait and trim it after you add the top IP part, being sure as you glue it that the holes line up perfectly with the instruments on the back part. Trim any excess cellophane (if needed) and you should now have an IP with "glass" over the instruments. Here's a pic from my A-18 Shrike II build that shows what I mean... although in THIS case I glued instrument decals (yet another option this allows) instead of "scratching" the instruments on. Those other things are ammo boxes.... Hope that helps! Let me know if I wasn't clear enough. Gil
  4. This is the 1/48 Lone Star resin O-47, a late 1930s/early WWII recon plane; and the only kit of this type ever in quarter scale. It's one of their best castings as far as detailing inside and out, and the solid cast wings fit like a glove to the fuselage (a good thing, as you'll see). It includes white metal detail parts for the landing gear, prop, antennas, and other assorted details. This is what you get in the box.... Here's the interior Here's the interior after painting. I did add a few assorted details from the spares box (ammo boxes, O2 cylinders, etc.) and scratchbuilt the rear gunner's seat/gun ring. I also scratchbuilt a new main instrument panel using the old "sandwich" method. The toughest part of the build was having to add and blend in the bottom side observation windows. Since they needed to be added to BOTH the fuselage and wings, each wing had to be glued in place BEFORE gluing the fuselage halves together; a first for me in almost 60yrs of building! Luckily, the wings slide onto the fuselage with excellent fit (improved with some test fitting and adjusting) and at the proper angles. This allowed the side windows to be glued from the inside and outside (for extra security) and also to fill inside and outside along the edges as needed. One thing missing from my kit was the rollover structure behind the pilot's seat that also serves as the antenna mounts. It was built up with tubing and sheet plastic. It can be seen under the vac canopy part, which is in place to drill the holes to test fit the antennas. The kit white metal prop blades were fine sanded and polished to be able to use them without painting, except for their tips and some maroon antiglare paint on their rears. The model was primed overall with Alclad Gloss Black enamel in prep for the NMF. The clear parts were actually painted silver before spraying the black so their interior frames would look silver. It took several rounds of primer to be sure everything was smooth enough for the NMF. I used Floquil Platinum Mist for this, since silver shows scratches very well and it was also the base paint for the "interior" canopy frames and the fabric covered flying surfaces. AK Extreme Metallics Aluminum was used for the base NMF with Alclad Aluminum panels added over it. The fabric covered ailerons and were painted Floquil Platinum Mist and flat coated. The antiglare panel (and interior) were painted with AK Bronze Green. The rudder striping was painted instead of using the provided decals. The kit comes with markings for 6 or more O-47s, including war game crosses. I did an Ohio National Guard bird. Here's the rest of the finished pics.... Critiques, questions, and comments welcome, as always! Gil
  5. Phenomenal looking work, even without the lighting! Gil
  6. WOW! Where do I begin? Even if this was one of the Robert's Models releases with a few white metal detail parts included that is an ASTOUNDING build! And it's not enough to just build it, but you drooped the flaps and the stabilizers too. I'm assuming the beaching gear is all scratchbuilt and it looks quite the part. But I think the thing that impresses me the most is all of the glass work is superb. Did you have to vack new clear parts yourself? I know the Combat stuff is seldom as nice looking as what's on your model. As a fellow vacuform masochist, I'm standing and applauding! BRAVO! Gil
  7. Those look useful and convenient for anyone who's tired of using old coffee cups, cigar boxes and such. Thanks for the tip! Gil
  8. The way you have them posed looks good as they seem to be interacting, especially if you have it titled as you suggested. The figures look good and you nailed those green aviators! Since you say they're not quite done my guess is you'll be adding a few highlights/shadows to their uniforms, hands, and faces; though they actually look good for display as is. The only other idea, since you're setting it in a situation to be looked at; you don't have to go with grass if you don't like its look. If you put a couple of stanchions with a rope between them and add a small info sign you can make a museum floor. Or, you can make a short back wall to suggest it's in a hangar and put it on a concrete floor. In any case, unless you plan to compete with it, I wouldn't get too hung up on how "scale" the grass is or what surface you set it on. Gil
  9. Looks great! I'd proudly sit it on my shelf! Gil
  10. FLABBERGASTED is the only term that comes to mind seeing the extent of all of your work, including all of the extra scratchbuilt details and accessories! It seems that the Duke now has a rival in the Marquis of Modeling! 🙂 Gil
  11. That looks exquisite! I'm looking forward to your getting some repairs done and then some pics of it in the upright position. I'm also interested in what method you used to make the airship body.... was it thin sheet plastic over framing, or what? Sure looks authentic! Gil
  12. Looks good! The wood framing nicely sets off the interior. Gil
  13. Wow! When you said you had some knock-out pin holes to fill you weren't kidding! Excellent work, and much neater looking than whenever I attempt to add stringers like that. Question: You drilled holes in those side stringers..... I've found it very hard to get my drill low/perpendicular enough to drill through a part like that without bending and breaking the bit. What tool and method are you using to frill them? Gil
  14. Jaxcon is a GSB judged show, but there's absolutely NO "scoring" used to determine that. The judging teams just judge the basics and decide according to our written standards what the model earns, or doesn't. Here's a link to the "handheld" standards we issue to all judges and used for Jaxcon: https://www.ipmsfirstcoast.com/gsbjudging/jaxconjudgeguidelines2023.pdf Here's the link to the more fully detailed standards as posted on our website: https://www.ipmsfirstcoast.com/gsbjudging/jaxcon2023gsbjudgestds.pdf There IS one caveat to the above..... this was the first year we had dedicated Zones for the Gundams and Lego models (there were less than 10 in each) and I did design judging criteria that did involve a bit of "math" since we had no true experience in judging those and felt we couldn't approach them exactly as we do regular plastic kits. If these Zones grow in the future we'll have a "handheld" guideline with their different basics of construction and finish and eliminate the points/math for them as well. Below are the two forms we used for those 2 Zones... they worked very well for so few entries, but would not work if we started getting 20+ entries. GUNDAM DISPLAY ZONE JUDGING CRITERIA SHEET ENTRY#_______________ SUBJECT/TITLE_______________________________________________ ENTRIES WILL BE AWARDED 1 POINT PER CRITERIA (Good=1pt, bad=0pts) EXCEPT FOR B1a, C1, C2, C3. Gold = 14+ point Silver = 11-13 points Bronze = 8-10 points A) Construction 1-Basics a) seams ______ b) glue marks ______ c) sprue nubs ______ d) clear parts ______ e) complexity (movable parts are movable) ______ f) sanding scratches ______ B) Finish 1-Painting a) whole or 75%+ model painted (award 2 points) ______ b) model 50% or less painted ______ c) smoothness (airbrushed or no paint brush strokes) ______ d) decal silvering ____ e) small detail painting ______ f) consistent clear coat overall ______ C) Bonus points 1- Weapons/Hand held Accessories (1point for each) ______ 2- Lighting added not included in kit (2 points) ______ 3- Motion added not included in kit, not including rotating bases (3 points) ______ TOTAL POINTS ______ And..... LEGO DISPLAY ZONE JUDGING CRITERIA SHEET ENTRY # ___________ ENTRY SUBJECT/TITLE ________________________________________ ENTRIES WILL BE AWARDED 1 POINT PER CRITERIA (Good=1pt, bad=0pts), EXCEPT 3B. 8+ = GOLD 6-7pts = SILVER 4-5pts = Bronze 1) Construction a) Neatness (dirt smears, finger prints?): ____ b) Complexity (simple shape or not?): ____ c) Consistency (any gappy seams or missing blocks?): ____ 2) Finish a) Color flow (are colors grouped aesthetically or randomly?): ____ b) Consistent color (do any bricks look faded or old?): ____ c) Over all finish (is the shine or flatness even over all?): ____ 3) Bonus points a) Original design, not built from a kit (point awarded for originality): ____ b) Lighting and/or motion added (that was NOT included in a kit, 1pt for each): ____ 4) Overall Presentation (you can tell what the builder intended): ____ TOTAL POINTS ____ Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks! Gil
×
×
  • Create New...