Jump to content

RGronovius

Member
  • Posts

    1,174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by RGronovius

  1. The high end kits are also super accurate with a plethora of parts. Lots of research and development to pay for. And you do get what you pay for; many of the new uber kits are well worth the price. The biggest commotion is from new kits with a high price tag that aren't as detailed or as accurate as older kits. Academy is normally the biggest offender in the armor world. They put out a great kit, then a similar kit that's not nearly as good as one that's been on the market for decades.
  2. I think ten years from now will be pretty much like it is now. Static models have become high end items. Very few low end kits (except older reissues) and multimedia high end uber kits. Even new Star Wars kits tend to be simple snap togethers but have lights and sounds so they build into $25 toys. We've basically got two choices, high end expensive kits and low end simple kits. My local Hobby Lobby carries ancient (30+ year old) Italeri kits for $49.99, kits long past their prime that went for like $15-20 back in the day.
  3. The Red October and the Dallas were different scales. I built both. I can check my excess decals to see if I still have them.
  4. When I first read this thread, I saw it as will model car magazines (in general) survive. Not as a specific title of a model car magazine called Model Car Magazine.
  5. Let me go through the kits to make sure all is there and I'll get a message to you.
  6. I'd like to get rid of them together since the kit would be worthless to me without decals.
  7. I have a Glencoe box with this kit in it and a couple other kits like a Testors Nieuport with some parts started and the both decal sets untouched. I'd need to make sure it's complete (both kits).
  8. The pilot is an optional part. Sort of like if your kit comes with bombs, missiles or drop tanks. Obviously, some versions use one or the other, but none use all and the extra optional parts stay in the box.
  9. I just google searched and found some vampire decals http://www.mavdecals.co.za/index.php?cPath=23_48
  10. Neat, it is similar to a P-61 Black Widow I made into a float plane with the leftovers of a Kingfisher way, way, way back in the early 1980s.
  11. Amazing build, I am impressed.
  12. The local closeout store also had some Lindberg missile, red one I think called a Snark that I almost got. But I hadn't even cracked open the corporal so I left it.
  13. Those old biplanes hold up well
  14. Nice job on a classic kit. I picked up their Corporal missile a while back.
  15. I do notice as I visit several forums that the same person posts the same items across different sites. I don't blame them and have done so myself a couple of times.
  16. Pete gets it. I mean this site as a whole. Very little movement in any topic. Yes, this particular thread is getting a number of good responses, but you can count new responses across the forum on one hand. In many online forums, if you miss a day, there's a lot of reading to catch up on. Here, you could miss a week and catch up in just a few minutes. My main interests are armor and sci-fi modeling, but I have recently ventured back into car modeling that I had not done since high school over 35 years ago. I am not familiar with that particular car modeling magazine; the last time I read a car modeling magazine was the old Challenge Publications Scale Modeler and only when Military Modeler merged with Scale Modeler during my subscription and eventually ended production. I don't know if the magazine will survive. I subscribe to Fine Scale Modeler and also receive the Boresight journal which is an armor modeling magazine that comes with membership in the Armor Modeling and Preservation Society. The advent of the internet and facebook have hit modeling publications hard. Once upon a time, model magazines were the main source of new model news, model kit reviews, articles on how to "fix" or convert a particular model and other such tasks. Today, there are plenty of blogs, model websites with reviews, even Youtube videos with reviews for the casual modeler or advanced modeler to access without the need to spend money on an actual magazine. I have received kits from manufacturers and retailers in order to review them and post online. It is unfortunate that MCM has failed to pay authors for their work already received and published. I hope you find some positive resolution in this matter.
  17. Rusty, It's nice to read your comments and your dedication to keeping this a safe place for modelers to come and enjoy themselves. That's much appreciated Been kinda watching under the radar how things go here. Maybe I'll post something here in the future :m1helmet: . I find this site helpful and friendly, but very sleepy. Not a whole lot of movement here, but if everyone posted more, there'd be more activity.
  18. RGronovius

    F-16 Tiger

    Very sharp looking plane. The tail decal is amazing.
  19. Finally got around to buying the AFV Club M60A3TTS to go along with the M60A1. Looks to be a superb kit.
  20. This has to be a local (to you) issue. In the Hobby Lobby in Elizabethtown, KY and Louisville, I can still walk in and grab any can of Model Masters spray paint. I just bought a few cans there to work on my Revell Jeep Rubicon; yellow, primer and flat black.
  21. Looks tough to get in and out of when landed.
  22. Impressive. I always think I need to work on figures.
  23. I /wish I had seen the video before building the kit. It would have been useful. When the flares are fired out, the lower hull opens. To me, it looks like it opened way too wide and would have meant the flare compartment occupied the crew area. Neat nostalgia piece regardless.
  24. We are kind of our own worst enemies when it comes to Testors demise. For the last several years, "serious" modelers scoffed at those who still used Testors paints and cements. Model Masters military line was deemed for rookies and the masters used higher end boutique brands. I've always liked them and thought they were good enough for me. Their downfall was probably so many different shades of military paints that sales stagnated. Years ago, we'd have to mix colors with one another to get the shade we desired, something Tamiya still expects modelers to do and provides mix ratios in their kit instructions. If MM included a pamphlet with mix ratios to attain various shade of military colors from a smaller line of their colors, they'd probably still be going strong.
×
×
  • Create New...