Jump to content

Ron Bell

IPMS/USA Member
  • Posts

    1,875
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    177

Ron Bell last won the day on March 13

Ron Bell had the most liked content!

Reputation

458 Excellent

6 Followers

About Ron Bell

  • Birthday 06/05/1948

Profile Information

  • FirstName
    Ron
  • LastName
    Bell
  • IPMS Number
    12907
  • Local Chapter
    Eddie Rickenbacker
  • City
    Columbus
  • State
    OH
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Columbus, Ohio
  • Interests
    Braille scale British armor, classic kits, just getting in to ships.

Recent Profile Visitors

3,210 profile views
  1. This is the Revell SSI re-release of the Renwal USS Springfield. It's possibly one of the most inaccurate models of a ship ever made. The Springfield was converted to a guided missile cruiser after the war, her designation changing from CL 66 to CLG 7. Here are the problems. The kit has two triple 6 inch gun turrets but the converted Springfield only retained one. The kit has six double 5 Inch turrets but it should only have one. The kit has two pole masts but there should be three cage style masts. The kit gives you two Terrier missile launchers but there was only one. The fantail in the kit is configured for a hanger and crane for a stored seaplane, but a helo is given. On the reconfigured ship there was a heli-deck on the fantail but no provision for a hangar. But the helo they give you isn’t all that bad for what it is so I didn’t want it to go to waste, so I put a clear disc on for the rotor and posed it doing a “fly by”. Finally, the entire superstructure was completely reconfigured and the kit's is that from WW II. To fix all that would not be worth the effort, even if it were possible, so I used what they gave me. My only real change was to cut off the very thick molded in railings on the mail deck and replace them with PE and I added PE to the upper decks as well and stretched sprue for the rigging. There’s a photo of the removal of the railings “in progress”. Oh, one other thing. The kit comes with simulated wood decking on the main deck, but from what I can see from photos, aft of just about the centerline it was either removed or covered, which makes sense as the blast from the missiles being launched would have scorched a wood deck. So I sanded/scraped that detail off where needed and smoothed the deck. But, as they say, it is what it is and presented for your viewing pleasure, Revell/Renwal's USS Springfield.
  2. Have you tried an ABS cement such as is used on Plastruct materials? The plastic has a different chemical basis so "normal" cements don't work. Plastruct makes two cements, one is specifically for ABS plastic. Rubicon models are made of a plastic that does not respond to "normal" cements either, but ABS ones work fine.
  3. If that airbrush was new and as yet unused, there's an outside chance that there was some sort of a preservative on the metal parts. Another possibility is that the paint itself is contaminated or just not mixed thoroughly enough. Try straining the paint to remove any small particles and really mixing it up. I've bent a paperclip to form a "T" at the end and inserted it in my Dremel tool. Put it in the paint jar, turn it on LOW (and I do mean LOW or you'll have paint all over) and really give it a mix. Hold on to the paint jar or it may go flying.
  4. Is your airbrush clean, and I mean really clean? Many just shoot some thinner through the brush and declare it clean. Not so. Take it apart and give it a good cleaning to remove any possible residue then let it dry and reassemble. Did you wash the parts before painting? It looks to me as if there was some residue on the part itself like a mold release or some such that caused your problem. Two ways to proceed. One, remove all the paint, wash the part in dish detergent, let it air dry to avoid creating static electricity that will attract dust, then re-primer. Two, lightly sand the part especially in the effected areas, wash as in One above, then re-primer. If it happens again, then you know you've got an airbrush problem. Lastly, you didn't mention the type of paint used, solvent or water based. Each could react differently to surface or airbrush problems.
  5. That's a little better than the Rareplanes vacform I did many years ago, 😀. Excellent finish, as usual. I have always marveled at your NM work.
  6. Many Atlantis kits come with the decals for a stand but do not include said stand. They sell the stands as a separate accessory on their web site. Being in Ollies has nothing to do with they're not being in the kit. As to different pricing, I'd be dubious of Atlantis doing a "special run" for kits for a retailer. Another explanation for the price discrepancy might be because Revell also reissued those kits as part of their SSI (Select Subject Issue) series and they have different box art and pricing. Just guessing on that last part.
  7. The attitude of a large part of America today.
  8. Actually neither. It's Woodland Scenics tan Fine Ballast. I wanted more of a 'gravely' texture than sand would provide.
  9. This is a kit that dates from the 70's but is remarkably good, rivaling the current crop of Trumpeter and Dragon kits. I've done this scheme in 1/35th and 1/48th but needed one for my Braille Scale collection. The kit comes with no interior, which is odd as their Valentine of the same era had a driver's position, turret basket and basic interior detail. The driver's visor can be posed open or closed, but if open there's nothing there, not even a driver figure. Ditto for the loader's hatch. At least you get a commander figure to fill an open cupola. I built a box inside the driver's position and painted it black to hide the fact that there's nothing in there except the driver figure that I adapted from the spares' box. The loader is from the ESCI 25 pdr. kit with modifications to get him to sit right on the turret top. I added the wall segment to illustrate why the vehicles were painted this way. It's actually a section of a Matchbox kit's diorama base. I make no claim to fame in painting small scale figures. I just can't get the hang of it. But to be fair, the detail on figures from this era wasn't exactly "crisp".
  10. Your paint work is excellent. As to the gloss coat for the bomber jacket, maybe a semi-gloss would be better. Those jackets got plenty beat up. Also, is it me or do the arms on the RAF pilot look out of proportion (too large) to the rest of the figure?
  11. Or just use another company's clear coat, such as Tester's Gloss Coat. I've used it over all sorts of decals and Tamiya paints with no problem. You can still find it in Michaels and other craft stores and model RR stores.
  12. Clearly, no gap. Bend as suggested.
  13. Looks like a great show. That must be one huge church to have a fellowship hall that size and quality. Usually they are a dank room with a tile floor in the basement with the pipes exposed. Blizcon is next week and I hope we can equal your success. And by the way, you should get these posted on the IPMS/USA web site under "Websites" then "Gallery" then "Events Gallery" or send them in to the Journal for some coverage. You deserve it!
  14. For large pour plugs on flat parts I have used a Dremel belt sander. You need to go slow and check your work often, but it sure does make short work of it. I get it down to where I can hand sand the remainder so I don't go too far with the power tool.
  15. If what goes on in my local club is any indication of the "national scene", there's a third group of modelers, those that never build anything and there may be more of them than the other two. They may be serious kit collectors or may just never get around to building/finishing a model but they like the hobby for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...