RJackson

Correction: Jerry's reign as RC lasted nine years.

Jerry Taylor has not been at the forefront of IPMS for many years, but he left a large legacy both nationally and locally. Most of the old-timers here recognize his name. He had many non-modeling interests and had focused on them in later life. During the 70's through the early 90's he had a large footprint. Jerry was RC for Region 6 for 6 years. He was a regular national contest winner, often with a model that used the most obscure list of ingredients you could imagine. The Dorians were an ancient ethnic group in Greece considered one of the four major groups from around 1000BC. The galley was at the Dayton nationals in 1988. Based upon descriptions and drawings, it started life as a PVC pipe cut lengthwise and the bow was segmented and folded into a point. Scored and distressed, the wood grain was a combination of washes and drybrushing. The decorative horns were formed from Sculpy putty. The Papyrus Raft was another inspiration build. Representing ancient boats built in Egypt, Jerry found the best way to simulate it was to take the bristles from an O-Cedar broom and bind them together in the same way they would have been done back then. Jerry won a first in scratchbuilt ships and the IPMS Mexico award at the Nationals in Miami in 1990. Jerry scratchbuilt his Bushnell’s Turtle for the Omaha nats in 1994. He started with a Leggs pantyhose egg for the basic shape and driving the scale of the model. Again, scoring the plastic and paints and washes got the wood effect. Oh, the screws? They’re plastic rod and spiral macaroni! There are many other 'normal' models. These are just the ones I could find pictures of. Most importantly, Jerry would share with anyone. He would take any new modeler under his wing and help with suggestions and advice. I probably wouldn't be as good as I am without his help and there are many that will say the same. RIP Jerry. Rick Jackson

Has the on-line contest and model registration opened? If so, I haven't been able to find a link to start entering my models. If not, is there a projected date?

What feedback will we get on trophy sponsorships? Will there be a confirming email sent to the address used when the sponsorship was submitted or do we have to wait to see the sponsorship associated with the category on the master list?

I just had it pointed out to me that Busts as a sub-type has disappeared from the Figure category. Is it just a missing header and they are the 330-335 categories? Rick

I agree. While the lighter text makes the pictures and captions 'pop', it is still counter-productive to have the main text this light. Even if 'pop' is the goal. to carry the light text into the announcements and editorial pages doesn't make sense.

The only time I remember was Orange County. It sticks with me because I didn't know about it and was Junior head judge at the time. Missed the awards completely!

Are there any convention pins left over? I have lost track of mine and would like to replace it. Rick

Going to GSB won't 'solve' anything, especially in the first year(s). It will take some time for the judges to adapt to the new system. The result will be some models being 'undervalued' and some 'overvalued'. When that happens, social media will erupt again with the same vitriol wanting to know why, comparisons between models that got different medals and general dissatisfaction and calls of collusions, 'brother-in-lawing', etc. Same song, different verse.

There are also photos of some of the models for San Marcos and earlier contests in the IPMS Photo Galleries Events Gallery / IPMS/USA Nationals Galleries | IPMS/USA Gallery (ipmsusa3.org)

A few thoughts: Do we need an additional comment in the Early Steam and Sail category that ships built during that time and qualifying for this category will still be in category regardless of the calendar date? Quite a few ships that fit here served past the launch of Dreadnought and into WW I. This is the really the same issue mentioned with regard to submarines that were built pre-1946 but served into the 50's and 60's. Whether we go with construction date or service date should be consistent between all classes. OK, here I may be looking for a problem that doesn't exist, but here we go. in Category 404 and 405 we need to be careful about mentioning size in the description. As ship sizes increased over the years many early ships were physically smaller than later ships considered to be a smaller type (e.g. early cruisers versus modern destroyers). Ticonderoga class cruisers and Spruance class destroyers are on the same hull and almost the same weight but would be in different classes. Ship designation should clearly be emphasized as the primary factor if size is mentioned. Under Detailing, who determines whether drilling out a gun barrel is practical and whether a builder should be dinged for not doing it? I think we should stay with the concept that doing something like this should merit extra credit if done well but be a neutral item if not done.

Dave, not every decision by the NCC has to go through a public debate. That would be unworkable. Besides, as already established, this is a location change--it's not like it was done away with. It doesn't reach the threshold of earth-shattering. Now, let's hope those that do end up judging using this structure meet with your approval.

Tearing your shirt and overturning tables would be a useless overreaction. You have answered your own question. If you look at the published category list ( and the section you quoted) you will see that every diorama/vignette that previously existed in Dioramas is now within that class. Rick

As a perc this year, we have been providing IPMS memberships for chapter members. Once they get their membership, we log it so we have it at year-end for the charter renewal. Everyone seems to be getting a large number (ex. 63548946) in their confirmation email instead of the traditional 5-digit number. So far, none have received a membership card. Our chapter contact can't find anything but the large number on the new chapter roster on-line. I've seen it and my membership also shows the large number instead of the one I've had for 40 years. Is this a new system or are we just looking in the wrong place? How do we get the correct number for the re-charter? Rick

They're yours.

After conversing with Eric, the job is mine. So, this is a general call for volunteers to help takes pictures for the website gallery. If you are interested but aren't quite sure what you are signing up for, look in the Events Gallery and then in the IPMS/USA Nationals gallery for examples of what has been done before. Like I said above, people will focus on the one or two classes that most interest them. For those classes that don't have someone assigned to them I'll take examples from all of the photographers and compile them. We'll try to meet once or twice during the convention to do a data transfer of what you have. I'll then format them and upload them onto the web site. It's not terribly structured and is really just to give those who can't attend a chance to see what was there.

Pete Until I or someone is 'officially' in charge, you just need to keep your offer out there. Last time we did have people focusing on particular categories but I also took whatever they shot and were willing to share. This is especially important if a category is not picked up by someone. Everyone's contribution goes into those. No tally sheet is used since we have no need to match up photos like they do for the awards program. Rick

I headed this last year. The preferred format is JPG. Size is not as important as they will be resized before uploading to the website. Size only becomes an issue in how long it takes to transfer the files from you to me. Most cameras now use SanDisk cards but I have a multi-card reader if you have something offbeat. We usually determine a time and place to meet to transfer what you have to date and one to two meetings usually covers it. Rick Jackson

I like them too. But I am upset that when I went to the sponsorship page the Best Of awards were obscenely priced. I see that you are trying to target corporate sponsors, but why price out the chapters? The least expensive award is twice what we budgeted.

It may be one of several reasons. You could take that same Asuka Sherman and enter it in three different categories simply by making it a small comp diorama, a large comp diorama and sticking it on a plain wood base. Are you advocating for the elimination of categories you don't like to build in with the purpose of expanding ones that you do like?

Yes, while I usually have a box full of regular entries I often have an OOB entry. At least four of the last five years.

If people would simply stop trying to find loopholes and figure out ways to beat the system it would be simple. Virtually every rule there was in response to some entry that wasn't kosher.

Kits being so nice doesn't defeat the spirit of the category. It's been said many times, a bunch of extra details (whether they are additional plastic parts in the box or aftermarket) simply gives you more chances to screw up. It doesn't guarantee a win. As far as the OOB+ is concerned, only Ships have a real category that welcomes the high-tech kits into OOB as well as a separate, traditional OOB category. It seems to be working but the other classes haven't yet decided to adopt that format. They continue to have the limited, 40-year old exceptions as to what can be added and still be OOB in each class. Integrating the OOB into the regular categories was tried for several years. It proved to be a judging headache because the teams had to basically judge each category twice. You had to figure out the OOB winner but also if the OOB was going to win as a regular 1-2-3 winner. If it did, you had to go back and pick up the second OOB as that winner since the rules prevented you from winning two awards. Then there was also the chance that there wouldn't be an OOB in a category so the physical award would be wasted. Making a separate OOB category(ies) effectively guarantees the category will be filled out. And, as it has been pointed out, it's not like the current format is going wanting for entries.

I have loaded what I plan on loading to the gallery unless I identify a stray photo that needs to be added. Except for a couple of hiccups, I believe it went rather well and I want to thank all of the guys that contributed their time and effort to taking the pictures. Rick

Nick And an educated person would get the name right of the person being quoted. This whole thread has reached the point of being ridiculous. I suggest everyone take a break at least until after Chattanooga so they can have more kindling for the fire. Rick