Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Received my newest Journal (Vol.37 No.1) a few weeks ago and was happy to see our standard logo returned.

I have been a continuous member of IPMS since 1968 and like many old folks don't adjust well to radical changes.  IUJ or IJU or whatever it was was just too cryptographic for me.

Anyway  congratulations to the revamped staff for a great issue and I'm looking forward to #38-2.

 

  • Like 2
Posted

I meant Vol. 37 (bad key stroke) and I don't know why it shows I joined in 2024! That's just weird. Somethings wrong somewhere or I'll have to return my 50 year pin!

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I think that the new look and changes to the Journal have been a re-vitalization that it needed.

 

Posted

Yes, this last issue was much better, and the change back to the old name is very welcome. We no longer have to explain to people that we aren't Urologists... 

Posted (edited)

When the Journal was retitled, someone pointed out that the IUJ is an acronym for (amongst others) the International Union of Urologists, leading to some jokes hereabouts; people were taking the p!ss........😜

Edited by PaulBradley
×
×
  • Create New...